Chris has 20 years’+ experience of work related to ports and harbours, including advising on major infrastructure projects, port related commercial contracts and harbour legislation.
Chris specialises in the fields of projects and construction work and is a recognised expert in both areas. He has an extensive knowledge and experience of managing the projects/construction process.
He has advised a wide range of clients, public and private, on construction procurement (under many forms of contracts but with particular expertise in NEC) and on construction dispute resolution advising on high value arbitrations (including International ICC), adjudications, litigations and mediations.
He is a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and has experience of acting as an independent expert regarding solicitor professional negligence. He is a legal member of the Scottish Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.
Chris Mackay has an exceptional legal mind, and is keen to interrogate all possible angles of a case. Drafting is second to none with extreme clarity and always presented to the same high quality no matter the timescales. Makes even the most complicated matter look simple. True class leader.
Legal 500 (2022)
understanding of practical contract issues is excellent. He is also good at keeping teams on good terms in contentious disputes, and keeping everyone going until the point of resolution.
Legal 500 (2019)
has a keen eye for mitigating risk
Legal 500 (2018)
Related Insights
Error.
No results.
The smash and grab lives on: why payment notice deadlines matter in construction
13/11/2026
Thirty years on, courts still apply Construction Act payment deadlines strictly. A notice served one day late is out of time, however sound the claim.
When a valid claim isn't a valid notice: understanding construction payment notices
11/11/2026
This blog discusses how recent court decisions have clarified the requirements for valid payment notices.
Getting payment clauses wrong: drafting pitfalls in construction contracts
09/11/2026
This blog discusses the recent TCC decision in Deerns UK Ltd v VDC LHR11 Ltd: a timely reminder that sometimes the problem is not the payment notice at all but the payment machinery sitting behind it.
{name}
{properties.pageSummary}
{properties.headline}
{properties.pageDate|date:dd/MM/yyyy}
{properties.shortDescription}
{properties.eventName}
{properties.pageDate|date:dd/MM/yyyy}{properties.shortDescription}
