The Financial Services and Markets Bill 2026–27: A strategic reset for UK financial regulation

The Financial Services and Markets Bill 2026–27 (“the Bill”) marks another decisive step in the UK’s ongoing regulatory reform programme. Viewed in isolation, the individual measures in the Bill are significant. But when considered alongside the wider trajectory of reform - particularly as reflected in the Regulatory Initiatives Grid - they illustrate a more fundamental shift in direction.

At its core, this is about recalibrating the UK’s regulatory architecture post Brexit: simplifying legacy frameworks, reallocating regulatory responsibility and sharpening the focus on growth and competitiveness without losing sight of consumer protection and market integrity.

For financial services organisations, the key challenge is not simply to understand each individual reform, but to interpret how these changes interact across sectors and how they will reshape expectations of governance, accountability and regulatory engagement over the coming years.

Below, we have clustered the most significant elements of the Bill by sector, focusing on the practical implications and key takeaways.

1. Consumer & retail financial services

The consumer-facing reforms in the Bill are among its most significant. Collectively, they seek to modernise the regulatory framework for retail financial services, improve how consumers access redress, support financial inclusion and align consumer protection measures with today's increasingly digital marketplace. Many of the changes also reflect a broader policy objective of moving away from prescriptive legislative requirements towards a more agile model driven by FCA rules and supervision.

A fundamental reset of the consumer credit regime

• Significant repeal of many of the remaining Consumer Credit Act 1974 provisions, with migration into FCA rules.
• Greater flexibility and modernisation of a framework widely viewed as outdated.
  Implication: Firms should anticipate a more agile but more FCA-driven regime, with increased reliance on rules rather than statute.

Reform of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS)

• Clarification of FOS’ role to address concerns around “quasi-regulatory” behaviour.
• Measures to drive consistency and predictability in outcomes, including an adapted “fair and reasonable” test and a FOS referral scheme to the FCA when rules are ambiguous.
  Implication: Potential reduction in legal uncertainty, but firms should review complaints strategies and precedent reliance.

Mass redress and complaints handling

• Enhanced FCA powers to manage large-scale redress events.
• Ability to pause complaints progression where systemic issues arise.
  Implication: Greater regulatory control in crises and firms must be prepared for coordinated intervention.

Access to banking services

• New HM Treasury powers to address gaps beyond access to cash.
  Implication: Increased policy focus on financial inclusion, particularly for in-person services.
  

2. Banking & prudential framework

The banking reforms continue the post-Brexit evolution of the UK's prudential framework. Rather than fundamentally changing prudential standards, the Bill focuses on giving regulators greater flexibility to calibrate and update requirements through their rulebooks, while supporting the Government's wider objectives of economic growth, lending and competitiveness. The direction of travel is towards a more adaptable framework that can respond more quickly to market developments and changing risks.

Ring-fencing reform

• Transfer of key requirements from legislation into PRA rules.
• Greater flexibility in shaping the regime.
  Implication: More dynamic prudential framework, but with increased reliance on supervisory expectations.
  

Financial Policy Committee (FPC) changes

• Reduced minimum meeting frequency and updated governance provisions.
  Implication: Primarily operational, but reflective of broader streamlining across the framework.

Access to small and medium sized business (SME) finance (Commercial Credit Data Sharing scheme (CCDS) reforms)

• Expansion of credit data sharing beyond traditional banks.
• Enhanced FCA role.
  

  Implication: Broader participation and increased transparency in SME lending markets, improving competition and allowing better access to funding

3. Payments and market infrastructure

The payments landscape has become increasingly important to the UK's financial services sector, driven by innovation, digitisation and growing competition. The Bill seeks to simplify the regulatory architecture governing payment systems by reducing institutional fragmentation and creating a more streamlined model of oversight. These reforms sit within a broader agenda of ensuring that regulation remains efficient, proportionate and capable of supporting continued innovation.

Abolition of the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) and integration into the FCA

• Consolidation of regulatory oversight of payment systems.
  Implication: A more unified regulatory model, but firms should prepare for transitional complexity and evolving FCA priorities.
  
  

4. Governance, accountability and authorisation

A recurring theme throughout the Bill is the desire to reduce unnecessary administrative burden whilst maintaining strong regulatory standards. The governance and authorisation reforms are intended to make the UK's regulatory framework more proportionate, efficient and accessible, particularly for growing and innovative firms. However, while some procedural requirements may be simplified, the underlying expectations around good governance, accountability and effective oversight remain firmly in place.

Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) streamlining

• Removal of certification regime from legislation.
• Reducing the number of SMFs that will require pre-approval and repealing prescriptive statutory requirements on Statements of Responsibilities, enabling the regulators to consider appropriate requirements in their rules.
  Implication: A clear shift towards proportionality, but firms should not assume a reduction in regulatory expectations around accountability.

Appointed representatives (AR) reform

• A new regulatory gateway requires authorised firms to obtain FCA permission before acting as a principal.
• ARs brought within SM&CR scope.
• FOS jurisdiction extended to ARs.
  Implication: Material increase in oversight expectations for principal firms

Provisional authorisation regime

• Time-limited authorisation for early-stage firms (and particularly useful for innovative early-stage firms).
  Implication: Potential acceleration of innovation, but with closer supervisory scrutiny.
  
  

5. Cross-Sector regulatory architecture

Beyond individual sectors, the Bill contains several structural reforms that affect the overall operation of the UK regulatory framework. These measures are designed to improve coordination between regulators, clarify responsibilities and strengthen accountability, while supporting the Government's growth and competitiveness agenda. Taken together, they demonstrate a continued shift towards a regulatory system that places greater emphasis on outcomes, efficiency and strategic oversight.

Regulator accountability and efficiency reforms

• New long-term strategy requirements.
• Shorter deadlines for authorisations and approvals.
• Reduced procedural burdens in rulemaking.
  Implication: A more streamlined and output-focused regulatory model, aligned with the competitiveness agenda.

Anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing supervision consolidation

• FCA positioned as the single professional services supervisor.
  Implication: Greater consistency but also increased FCA influence across non-traditional sectors.

Overseas recognition regimes (ORRs)

• New framework will allow the HM Treasury to establish ORRs where an overseas jurisdiction delivers comparable outcomes.
  Implication: A more coherent and scalable approach to international regulatory recognition supporting cross-bored market access and the UK’s competitiveness.

Gibraltar Authorisation Regime (GAR) reforms

• Simplified pathway to implementation.
• The GAR will allow eligible Gibraltar-based firms to access UK wholesale and retail markets without requiring separate UK authorisation, provided specified conditions relating to regulatory alignment, cooperation and regulatory objectives are met.
  Implication: May accelerate cross-border activity between the UK and Gibraltar.
  
  

6. Insurance and capital markets innovation

The UK continues to position itself as a global centre for insurance, capital markets and financial innovation. The reforms in this area seek to ensure that the legislative framework remains sufficiently flexible to support new products, structures and sources of investment, whilst preserving appropriate safeguards. In particular, the Bill aims to strengthen the UK's attractiveness as a location for specialist insurance and risk transfer activities in an increasingly competitive international market.

Risk transformation and insurance vehicles

• Increased flexibility for funding arrangements
• New regulatory powers for insurance vehicles.
  Implication: Intended to support innovation and competitiveness in insurance markets.

Reforming the ring-fencing regime

• Modernises the statutory framework for the ring-fencing regime, introducing greater flexibility and ensuring it can evolve in line with developments in prudential regulation, the UK’s bank resolution framework and firms’ business models.
• The Bill shifts greater responsibility for detailed requirements to the PRA.
  Implication: The regime will become more flexible and simpler.
  
  

7. Financial crime and cryptoassets

As financial services become increasingly digital and internationally interconnected, regulators are placing greater emphasis on tackling financial crime and maintaining confidence in the integrity of UK markets. The Bill therefore includes targeted reforms intended to strengthen supervisory effectiveness and ensure that enforcement powers remain fit for purpose as new technologies and asset classes emerge. These measures demonstrate the Government's commitment to maintaining robust standards while supporting innovation and growth.

Recovery of illicit cryptoassets

• Creates a mechanism allowing technical updates to the recovery framework (under ECCTA) through secondary legislation where necessary
  Implication: Reinforces the direction of travel towards more robust crypto regulation and enforcement capability.
  
  

What does this mean in practice?

Taken together, the FSM Bill is not simply a package of technical amendments. It represents a continuation of a broader regulatory shift that is visible across the Regulatory Initiatives Grid:

• From statute to regulator rulebook: Increasing reliance on FCA/PRA rulemaking.
• From fragmentation to consolidation: Streamlining of regulators (e.g. PSR into FCA, AML supervision).
• From prescriptive to flexible frameworks: Particularly in prudential and innovation-focused areas.
• From process to outcomes: Greater emphasis on speed, competitiveness and regulatory efficiency.

For firms, this means rethinking how they engage with regulation andmoving away from a static, compliance-led view towards a more dynamic, forward-looking approach to regulatory change.

Call to action for financial services firms

The FSM Bill is still at an early stage, and its final form and implementation timelines will evolve. However, the direction of travel is already clear.

Firms should now:

• Monitor legislative progress and parallel FCA/PRA consultations closely.
• Identify areas where existing frameworks are likely to be replaced or re-scoped (particularly consumer credit, SM&CR and AR regimes).
• Assess the operational and governance implications of increased regulatory consolidation.
• Consider how these changes align with wider regulatory developments in the Regulatory Initiatives Grid.

If you would like to discuss how these reforms may impact your business or if you would like support in preparing for the next phase of implementation, please do get in touch.

Related News, Insights & Events