Daniel is a senior solicitor in our dispute resolution department working in the real estate litigation team. He qualified as a solicitor in 2024 after training at a commercial firm based in Glasgow and Edinburgh with a focus on civil litigation and disputes.

Prior to joining the firm, Daniel worked at the UK Supreme Court in London as a judicial assistant to the Right Hon. Lord Hamblen of Kersey, Justice of the Supreme Court. He gained significant experience in appellate litigation, working closely with the Justices on high-profile decisions in cases from across the UK. He also gained experience sitting in appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council involving several high-value disputes from financial centres across the globe. 

Daniel has himself appeared regularly in commercial disputes in the sheriff courts, assisted in multi-party mediation and in the Court of Session. He has experience across disputes on a variety of subject matters, with a focus on property litigation and real estate disputes.

Related Insights

Error.

No results.

Kulkarni V Gwent Holdings Ltd Ors When Is A Breach Of Contract Capable Of Remedy

Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd & Ors: when is a breach of contract capable of remedy?

26/03/2026

This blog unpacks the Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd & Ors decision and outlines the importance for parties to carefully consider breach consequences when drafting a shareholder agreement.

Read more
Odey Puts Culture On Trial The FCA’S New Non Financial Misconduct Framework Explained

Odey puts culture on trial: The FCA’s new non-financial misconduct framework explained

25/03/2026

This blog discusses the FCA's new non-financial misconduct framework and what firms should do now ahead of the guidance coming in to force.

Read more
Financial Conduct Authority Fends Off Challenge To Decision To Name Firm Under Investigation

Financial Conduct Authority fends off challenge to decision to name firm under investigation

17/03/2026

A recent court challenge a Financial Conduct Authority’s decision to name a firm at the outset of an investigation has shown how the “exceptional circumstances” test works.

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here Subscribe here