The standard NEC dispute resolution provision which provides for disputes to be decided firstly by adjudication and then by a specified tribunal have been under closescrutiny by the Scottish appeal court in the case of The Fraserburgh Harbour Commissioners v McLaughlin & Harvey Limited, [2021] CSIH 58.
The pursuer raised court proceedings for damages in respect of certain defects in the works for the primary purpose of interrupting prescription (i.e. time bar) prior to any adjudication proceedings being commenced. There was no dispute between the parties that the defender was entitled to insist on its contractual right to have the merits of the matter determined by adjudication, and then arbitration, rather than the courts. However, the parties were in dispute as to what should happen to the court proceedings in the meantime: should they be sisted (i.e. paused) or dismissed?
You can read Chris Mackay and Andrew Little’s blog to find out why the court concluded it would sist the current court action pending the outcome of an adjudication and arbitration determining the merits of the dispute.
Related News, Insights & Events
Error.
No results.
Interim interdict: when is it really effective?
07/01/2026
In this blog, we unpack the key principles governing an interim interdict claim and provide insight into why it should not be sought lightly.
Building Safety in Scotland – what to expect in 2026
17/12/2025
Here, we outline key Scottish building safety developments for 2026, including the levy delay, cladding remediation progress, the CAR and Compliance Plan reforms.
The Scottish Developer Remediation Contract – what’s the latest
17/12/2025
Here, we discuss Scotland’s Developer Remediation Contract, making cladding commitments legally binding and requiring developers to assess and fix in-scope buildings.
{name}
{properties.pageSummary}
{properties.headline}
{properties.pageDate|date:dd/MM/yyyy}
{properties.shortDescription}
