The standard NEC dispute resolution provision which provides for disputes to be decided firstly by adjudication and then by a specified tribunal have been under closescrutiny by the Scottish appeal court in the case of The Fraserburgh Harbour Commissioners v McLaughlin & Harvey Limited, [2021] CSIH 58.
The pursuer raised court proceedings for damages in respect of certain defects in the works for the primary purpose of interrupting prescription (i.e. time bar) prior to any adjudication proceedings being commenced. There was no dispute between the parties that the defender was entitled to insist on its contractual right to have the merits of the matter determined by adjudication, and then arbitration, rather than the courts. However, the parties were in dispute as to what should happen to the court proceedings in the meantime: should they be sisted (i.e. paused) or dismissed?
You can read Chris Mackay and Andrew Little’s blog to find out why the court concluded it would sist the current court action pending the outcome of an adjudication and arbitration determining the merits of the dispute.
Related News, Insights & Events
Error.
No results.
Reform of late payments and likely impact on the UK construction industry
05/05/2026
In this article we examine proposed late‑payment reforms and what construction businesses should be considering now.
Geopolitics meets the supply chain
28/04/2026
In this article we discuss how construction parties manage global volatility through pricing mechanisms, change in law provisions and force majeure drafting.
The Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill passes: what this means for Scottish construction and housebuilding
02/04/2026
In this article, we build on our previous analysis of the bill at parliamentary Stages 1 and 2 and consider what the final form means for developers and housebuilders operating in Scotland.
{name}
{properties.pageSummary}
{properties.headline}
{properties.pageDate|date:dd/MM/yyyy}
{properties.shortDescription}
