In the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel (see our previous update here for case details), the Supreme Court has confirmed that part-year workers under permanent contracts are entitled to 5.6 weeks leave per year and their leave entitlement should not be pro-rated to that of a full-time worker (as argued by Harpur Trust). The pay for that leave should be calculated using s.224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, meaning that it should be based on the average weekly remuneration in the period of 52 weeks, ending with the start of the leave period (minus any weeks that have not been worked). For such workers, holiday pay should not be calculated based on 12.07% of their annualised hours. Even though that may result in higher rates of holiday pay for certain part-year workers, the Supreme Court is satisfied that is the correct implementation of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
Employers who apply the 12.07% holiday pay calculation, especially employers who engage workers with atypical working patterns (like offshore workers), may need to review their holiday pay arrangements (if they haven’t done so already). Please get in touch if we can assist.
Written by
Related News, Insights & Events
Error.
No results.
AI in the workplace
15/10/2025
This blog focuses on AI in the workplace from an employment law perspective, examining new risks and trends, along with giving guidance on best practice.
Civil penalties and the gig economy
09/10/2025
New tougher law introduced to conduct right to work checks to those in non-traditional employment.
Webinar recording: Employment Law Lab September edition
23/09/2025
Listen to our employment webinar - your one stop shop for all things employment law related.
{name}
{properties.pageSummary}
{properties.headline}
{properties.pageDate|date:dd/MM/yyyy}
{properties.shortDescription}
