In the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel (see our previous update here for case details), the Supreme Court has confirmed that part-year workers under permanent contracts are entitled to 5.6 weeks leave per year and their leave entitlement should not be pro-rated to that of a full-time worker (as argued by Harpur Trust). The pay for that leave should be calculated using s.224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, meaning that it should be based on the average weekly remuneration in the period of 52 weeks, ending with the start of the leave period (minus any weeks that have not been worked). For such workers, holiday pay should not be calculated based on 12.07% of their annualised hours. Even though that may result in higher rates of holiday pay for certain part-year workers, the Supreme Court is satisfied that is the correct implementation of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
Employers who apply the 12.07% holiday pay calculation, especially employers who engage workers with atypical working patterns (like offshore workers), may need to review their holiday pay arrangements (if they haven’t done so already). Please get in touch if we can assist.
Written by
Related News, Insights & Events
A guide to the ECCTA ID verification process
A step-by-step guide to verify your identity online to comply with the identity verification (IDV) regime introduced by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA).
Top tips for employers facing personal injury claims
Guidance for employers on handling personal injury claims, including disclosure, insurance, stress at work, and settlement agreements, with practical tips to manage risk effectively.
For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers: Supreme Court rules on meaning of “sex"
The Supreme Court has ruled that “man”, “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex, clarifying how sex-based rights apply in law.
