In the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel (see our previous update here for case details), the Supreme Court has confirmed that part-year workers under permanent contracts are entitled to 5.6 weeks leave per year and their leave entitlement should not be pro-rated to that of a full-time worker (as argued by Harpur Trust). The pay for that leave should be calculated using s.224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, meaning that it should be based on the average weekly remuneration in the period of 52 weeks, ending with the start of the leave period (minus any weeks that have not been worked). For such workers, holiday pay should not be calculated based on 12.07% of their annualised hours. Even though that may result in higher rates of holiday pay for certain part-year workers, the Supreme Court is satisfied that is the correct implementation of the Working Time Regulations 1998.

Employers who apply the 12.07% holiday pay calculation, especially employers who engage workers with atypical working patterns (like offshore workers), may need to review their holiday pay arrangements (if they haven’t done so already). Please get in touch if we can assist.

Written by

Related News, Insights & Events

Error.

No results.

Employment Law Lab

Employment Law Lab Webinar

03/02/2026 - Online webinar


This webinar focuses on the various reforms outlined in the Employment Rights Act.

Read more
Horizon Scan The Risk Landscape In 2026

The risk landscape in 2026: A horizon scan of what lies ahead for business leaders

19/01/2026

This horizon scanning article sets out some of the key risks for 2026 already visible across many sectors.

Read more
Are Last Orders Being Called On The Company Christmas Party

Are last orders being called on the company Christmas party?

18/12/2025

Greater emphasis on work-life balance, employees' health consciousness, combined with amendments to employment law, might shift the Christmas party as we know it.

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here Subscribe here