In the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel (see our previous update here for case details), the Supreme Court has confirmed that part-year workers under permanent contracts are entitled to 5.6 weeks leave per year and their leave entitlement should not be pro-rated to that of a full-time worker (as argued by Harpur Trust). The pay for that leave should be calculated using s.224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, meaning that it should be based on the average weekly remuneration in the period of 52 weeks, ending with the start of the leave period (minus any weeks that have not been worked). For such workers, holiday pay should not be calculated based on 12.07% of their annualised hours. Even though that may result in higher rates of holiday pay for certain part-year workers, the Supreme Court is satisfied that is the correct implementation of the Working Time Regulations 1998.

Employers who apply the 12.07% holiday pay calculation, especially employers who engage workers with atypical working patterns (like offshore workers), may need to review their holiday pay arrangements (if they haven’t done so already). Please get in touch if we can assist.

Written by

Related News, Insights & Events

Error.

No results.

AI For HR Website (002)

AI for HR: navigating opportunities, risks and governance

04/11/2026 - Online webinar


This webinar will explore how AI is already being used in HR, the common pitfalls organisations are encountering, and the steps employers can take to use AI effectively and responsibly.

Read more
Employment Law Lab

AI in the workplace and Employment Tribunal litigation

09/10/2026

This article explores the ways in which generative AI is changing the volume, style and sophistication of workplace complaints and Employment Tribunal documents.

Read more
Law Lab Yt

Webinar recording: Employment Law Lab - September 2026

05/10/2026

Listen to our bi-monthly employment webinar. Your one-stop for all things employment law-related.

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here Subscribe here