One of our clients is celebrating after we were able to secure the removal from a planning approval for a new development of an obligation that would have cost them more than £80,000.

We challenged the decision by a local authority to impose public realm improvements when granting permission for the development.

The Reporter who heard the case assessed the planning obligation against the five well-established legal tests that must be met in order to be valid – and upheld.

The obligation must: (i) be necessary, (ii) serve a planning purpose, (iii) have a relationship to the proposed development, (iv) be appropriate in scale and kind, and (v) be reasonable in all other respects.

The appeal was lodged under Section 75A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, which allows developers to apply to the Government where a local planning authority has refused to vary or discharge obligations within Section 75 agreements.

In this case the Reporter was not persuaded that the public realm works, which the Council had claimed the money would fund, were sufficiently related to the development.

Central to the Reporter’s reasoning was that the works had been undertaken before the development had been built and formed part of a wider Council programme of road improvements.

The Council could not show that the public realm works would not have been needed irrespective of the development.
The Reporter also ruled that the contribution was not appropriate in scale and kind and was not reasonable. The contribution therefore failed 3 of the 5 legal tests.

A copy of the Reporter’s decision can be found here.

It can be difficult for developers to resist requests for planning gain when they are being negotiated. Resistance will almost certainly delay the planning permission process, which can have significant knock-on effects on the whole project as well as potential financial implications.

Section 75A enables a developer to have an existing planning gain obligation reviewed against the up-to-date position. This case is a solid example of what can be achieved when an obligation is successfully challenged.

The decision is also a useful reminder to local authorities of the importance of ensuring that each of the five legal tests for valid planning obligations is met.

We regularly advise developers and local authorities on planning gain matters, including the drafting and negotiation of planning agreements and section 75A reviews.

For more information please contact a member of our planning team.

Written by

Related News, Insights & Events

Error.

No results.

Property Risks Conference Navigating Change In Commercial Property Website

Property Risk Conference - Navigating Change in Commercial Property

23/04/2026


Join us for our property risk conference, a morning seminar bringing together legal and industry insight on the key risks and opportunities shaping the commercial property sector.

Read more
The Building Safety Levy Scotland Bill Passes What This Means For Scottish Construction And Housebuilding

The Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill passes: what this means for Scottish construction and housebuilding

02/04/2026

In this article, we build on our previous analysis of the bill at parliamentary Stages 1 and 2 and consider what the final form means for developers and housebuilders operating in Scotland.

Read more
Building Safety The Scottish Compliance Plan

Building Safety: The Scottish Compliance Plan

31/03/2026

In this article, we discuss the Compliance Plan Approach, a new Scottish system enhancing building safety through proactive compliance, oversight, and accountability for high-risk buildings.

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here Subscribe here