My colleagues Karen Manning and Kirstin Beattie’s blog on “New Year, new start for construction?” gave me food for thought on what trends we might see emerging in contractual disputes in 2021.

I recalled an uncommon clause in a contract last year which allowed the employer to omit works and then give the work to another contractor.

So, given the impact of coronavirus on the economy, will developers look to try and omit works as a means of reducing the cost of the project?

What does your contract say?

The starting point will always be the contract. Standard form contracts allow for the omission of work.

The Scottish Building Contract Committee (SBCC) under both standard and design & build forms, states that a Variation includes “the alteration or modification of the design, quality or quantity of the Works including the addition, omission or substitution of any work” (clause 5.1.1.1).

The NEC suite of contracts doesn’t specifically refer to omissions.  Any omission would be dealt with by a Project Manager giving an instruction.

So, can an employer omit all or the majority of the works?

In short, no.

While the SBCC contracts expressly entitle employers to omit works, these provisions are subject to limitations on the amount of work which can be omitted (unless your contract specifically allows it!).

This is because a contractor has a right and a duty to carry out the works. Where works are being omitted, the contractor is being deprived of that right which may be considered to be a breach of contract.

Can omitted works be given to another contactor?

Again, the short answer is no. Unless your contract allows for it.

What should I do if I receive an instruction to omit works?

First, read your contract to check that the employer is entitled to omit the works. If they are, consider what works are being omitted and why in the context of the project.

Are they effectively trying to change the nature and character of the works? If so, you should put the employer/CA on notice that the instruction is not an instruction in accordance with the contract; that they are potentially in breach of contract and reserve your rights at common law for any damages which could arise as a result of the breach of contract.

If the omission is an omission of part of the works, legitimately within the context of the project, then the instruction must be followed.

If you are currently negotiating contracts and there is a provision which entitles the employer to omit large sections of work, you should consider what this means for you in terms of profitability - and whether there is any compensatory provision in the contract to protect you.

Related News, Insights & Events

Error.

No results.

Financial Conduct Authority Fends Off Challenge To Decision To Name Firm Under Investigation

Financial Conduct Authority fends off challenge to decision to name firm under investigation

17/03/2026

A recent court challenge a Financial Conduct Authority’s decision to name a firm at the outset of an investigation has shown how the “exceptional circumstances” test works.

Read more
J&M Properties V George Weightman

All is fair in fair notice: the importance of specification and fair notice in professional negligence claims

12/03/2026

The recent decision in J&M Properties v George Weightman [2026] SC AIR 12 echoes the long-standing principle that specification and the provision of fair notice is essential for effective pleadings.

Read more
New Sbcc Contracts Explained Key Changes And What They Mean For Your Projects

New SBCC contracts explained: key changes and what they mean for your projects

10/03/2026

Here, we discuss the rollout of the new SBCC 2024 contracts and key changes, including legislative alignment, sustainability, collaboration and modernised provisions affecting construction projects.

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here Subscribe here