The conclusion of the main storyline for the majority of existing private finance initiative (PFI) projects in the UK is approaching, with the peak of contract expiries due through the late 2020s and 2030s.
Recent tales from the industry have demonstrated how the expiry phase of PFI contracts presents various risks to the contracting parties, but also opportunities to avoid a ‘Grimm’ conclusion.
Our construction and projects team have a wealth of experience in helping clients to influence the final chapters in the story of their PFIs.
A focus on the opening
PFI enabled private consortia to design, build, finance, and operate public infrastructure, with an aim to transfer certain key risks to the private sector and allow public investment to be spread over the lifetime of the arrangement. Much of the focus and fanfare was understandably devoted to the initial delivery of much-needed infrastructure improvements, attracting headlines and plaudits for those involved in putting the deals in place. How the arrangements would conclude was naturally less of a priority but, as many an author has found, it can be crucial to effectively plan the ending when writing the beginning.
Most PFI deals are drafted to expire after 20-25 years. As the heyday of project signings stretched throughout the noughties, expiry and handover of many of these contracts is imminent. PFI contracts will contain provisions governing that process, but greater detail and clarity will often be seen in later PFI deals, drafted once standard form arrangements had been developed and deployed.
The initial tranche of PFIs coming to expiry are those forms developed by authorities with limited external input and standardisation. Given that background, there is likely to be a greater extent of drafting and approach issues for the parties to tackle and seek advice to mitigate effectively.
A tough read
The regrettable expiry period experience affecting Trentham Academy, a large secondary school in Stoke-on-Trent, has been reported across two years of updates in the press. Trentham is one of 88 schools covered by a 25-year PFI maintenance contract which came to an end in 2025. The school cited numerous issues with its the heating system and other maintenance problems, closing off areas including its swimming pool for many months. These problems stemmed from the PFI service provider failing to complete the pre-handback works that were contractually required before the contract ended.
Despite the local council expending considerable efforts to manage the end of the PFI contract and withholding funds where possible, feedback from the public sector was that the contract was too weighted towards the private sector to enable an effective resolution. Soon after a negotiated variation was signed to extend the PFI deal whilst implementing steps to remedy the situation, the special purpose vehicle holding the contract entered insolvency, terminating the arrangements and leaving the council to pick up the pieces.
Changing the narrative
Ernest Hemingway – 'The story was writing itself and I was having a hard time keeping up with it.'
Positive outcomes can be achieved with consistent monitoring, early attention, openness to alternative solutions and effective collaboration between the parties. Official guidance has previously recommended that the public sector authority should begin preparing for handover at least seven years prior to the expiry date, with an emphasis on gathering as much evidence as possible about the state of the facilities and the required works as possible.
Better still is an approach which works to consistently check, benchmark and improve upon the service delivery throughout the PFI arrangements, pausing to review and refresh the relationship between the key parties and their mutual objectives during the latter half of the contract period in particular.
Long before the usual eighteen months of survey and expiry provisions of the arrangements kick-in, the parties may well benefit from considering whether a collaborative approach to vary the contractual handback provisions, and perhaps make a change to the drafted process and targeted outcomes for the asset, might lead to a better result for all.
Burness Paull can assist in considering the options and developing the strategy to try to ensure that the tale of your vital PFI assets can continue into a bright next volume of their story. We look forward to sharing more in the next article in our series.
Written by
Related News, Insights & Events
Error.
No results.
PPP and PFI expiry: can a ‘happily ever after’ be achieved?
17/03/2026
Here, we discuss the expiry of UK PFI contracts, the challenges seen in recent projects, and how early planning and collaboration can help deliver better outcomes.
New SBCC contracts explained: key changes and what they mean for your projects
10/03/2026
Here, we discuss the rollout of the new SBCC 2024 contracts and key changes, including legislative alignment, sustainability, collaboration and modernised provisions affecting construction projects.
Case Update: The importance of clear drafting in collateral warranties and time bar
04/02/2026
Here, we discuss a Court of Session appeal confirming there is no presumed time bar in collateral warranties, with courts focusing strictly on the wording agreed and not implying defences.
{name}
{properties.pageSummary}
{properties.headline}
{properties.pageDate|date:dd/MM/yyyy}
{properties.shortDescription}