One of the things that English based IP lawyers find most surprising about the court system in Scotland is that we have no equivalent to discovery. In this jurisdiction there is no blanket obligation on a party to a litigation, to disclose documents to their opponent.

There is no doubt that this brings a cost saving, but it can be frustrating for rights holders who want to access evidence of wrongdoing and/or infringement but which is not easily obtainable in Scotland. This issue was identified in the Intellectual Property (Enforcement, etc) Regulations 2006 (giving effect to Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of IPR) with Scotland specific provisions to allow for disclosure of information in IP cases.

However, one way round this is for the  rights holder to apply to the Scottish IP Court for an order requiring any other person in Scotland (not just party to the action) to produce documents and/or property during the course of the action. One note of caution is that the Court will not authorise a “fishing expedition” and before a document recovery order is granted, the rights holder must demonstrate that the documents/property are relevant to their claim as presented..

A document recovery order can be sought at any time after defences have been lodged and before the proof (trial). The timing of the request of the order will normally be driven by tactical or commercial considerations.

The person that is believed to have the documents (the “haver”) may not produce them voluntarily. If that happens, they can be called to appear at a hearing where they will have to answer questions, under oath, about which documents exist, and where they are.  At that stage, all documents within the possession of the haver, that fall within the order, must be produced – even if they are adverse to that party’s case. A commission is a useful way of getting a witness’ position “on record” in advance of trial.

The haver may claim that they are confidential. If that is the case they should lodge the documents in court in a sealed envelope, so that the court can decide whether they should be disclosed. Documents recovered in this way can only be used for the purposes of the litigation and must otherwise be kept confidential.

The absence of disclosure in Scotland makes applications for a “dawn raid” order (the Scots equivalent of a Search and Seizure Order) more likely to be of benefit and it is experience the IP Court is probably more willing to grant such an order in Scotland, compared to England.

Written by

Related News, Insights & Events

Energy Risk Conf

Navigating legal and compliance challenges in the energy sector: from environmental risks to workforce management

01/10/2025 - The Marcliffe Hotel (N Deeside Rd, Pitfodels, Aberdeen AB15 9YA)


Navigating legal and compliance challenges in the energy sector conference - we will cover environmental risks to workforce management

Read more
Arbitration Networking Breakfast Image 06.08.25

Arbitration Networking Breakfast

05/09/2025 - Burness Paull, Edinburgh office


Come join us with Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer for an internal networking event, coinciding with 'ArbFest'

Read more
DR Litigation Re Humanising Event 3.9.25 Linzi

The changing face of litigation and dispute resolution – A Mindful Business Charter event for legal professionals

03/09/2025 - Burness Paull Edinburgh office


This event will showcase and bring together various important initiatives that are seeking to rehumanise the way litigation and dispute resolution more generally is conducted

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here Subscribe here