Scotland is taking bold steps to embed Passive House equivalent standards into its building regulations, with legislative changes already underway.

While the environmental ambition is clear, if achieved this shift would carry major implications - especially for developers, house builders, consultants and legal advisors who would bear the brunt of delivering these standards in practice.

So, what might change - and how can you prepare?

What Is Passive House?

Originally developed in Germany in the 1990s (Passivhaus), Passive is a rigorous energy-efficiency standard. At its core, it balances the energy a building gains and loses, relying on a highly efficient building envelope and mechanical systems to maintain comfortable, healthy indoor environments with minimal energy use. 

Passive House design is built on five key principles:

• Thermal insulation: Exceptionally high levels of insulation to minimise heat loss.
• Airtightness: Construction that prevents air leakage, improving energy efficiency.
• High-performance windows: Triple-glazed, with insulated frames — optimised for solar gain in winter and shading in summer.
• Mechanical Ventilation with Heat Recovery (MVHR): Supplies fresh air while recovering up to 90% of heat from outgoing air.
• Thermal bridge-free design: Elimination of weak points in insulation where heat can escape.

Why does Passive House matter?

Passive House buildings offer:

• Up to 90% less energy use for heating and cooling.
• Consistently high indoor air quality and thermal comfort.
• Lower energy bills and significantly reduced carbon emissions.

These benefits align directly with Scotland’s climate goals, tackling fuel poverty and improving living standards - especially in rural or hard-to-heat areas. 

Why Passive House now?

Some Passive House development is already occurring in Scotland in new build residential, social housing and education sectors, as well as some retrofitting projects. The Scottish Government sees Passive House as a solution to high energy bills, fuel poverty, and climate change. It claims the long-term cost savings in reduced heating and better indoor air quality will offset higher construction costs.

However, from a house builder’s perspective, the reality is more complex.

Scotland’s legislative commitment: Ambition meets uncertainty

In December 2022, the Scottish Government committed to embedding Passive House equivalent standards into Scottish building regulations by December 2024 (“Passive Hoos”), following widespread support for the Domestic Building Environmental Standards (Scotland) Bill.

This commitment forms part of a wider “Fabric First” strategy, prioritising the building envelope before deploying renewables or other technologies. The timetable has moved back, but key planned milestones include:

• Stage 1 Scottish Government Consultation (July–October 2024): Received 350 responses from across the industry. It explored energy performance, ventilation, implementation timelines and compliance.
• Stage 2 Scottish Government Consultation (Summer 2025): Expected to propose revised performance targets and compliance frameworks.
• Revised standards published (Early 2026): Giving the industry a two-year lead-in, allowing developers, designers and contractors to prepare and upskill.
• Those revised standards would become mandatory for all new homes by 31 March 2028, covering private and social housing. Non-domestic buildings may follow in future phases, though no formal commitment has been made yet.

This is an ambitious approach, which would be a significant step forward for the future of energy-efficient homes. However, some in the industry have queried the likelihood of these steps being achieved within planned timescales, or even at all, in light of the challenges and financial pressures that Passive House equivalent standards in Scotland could bring. 

Meantime, some regulatory changes are already in motion to support the potential transition. In December 2024, the Scottish Government amended the Building (Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2004, with changes coming into force on 31 March 2028. New requirements include:

• An Energy and Environmental Design Statement at the building warrant stage.
• An Energy and Environmental Construction Statement at completion.

These statements must demonstrate how the project complies with relevant energy and environmental standards.

Industry-wide challenges 

Transitioning to Passive House equivalent standards would test the construction and development system across the construction industry. Potential challenges include:

Will lower energy bills really help buyers?

The Scottish Government’s key justification hinges on lowering household energy bills. But housebuilders are sounding the alarm: the costs of achieving Passive House equivalent standards, particularly at scale, are substantial. Higher build costs, the need for larger plot sizes and the use of specialist components (like triple-glazed windows and MVHR systems), all challenge the economics of volume housebuilding. These additional costs will inevitably be passed onto homebuyers—at a time when affordability is already under severe pressure.

Skills shortages and supply chain fragility

Delivering Passive House equivalent standards at scale demands airtight construction, specialist installation of mechanical systems and flawless detailing to avoid thermal bridging. But there’s a clear shortage of trained workers across all these areas and with many components still imported, scaling up the domestic supply chain will take time - time the Scottish government’s current roadmap to 2028 doesn’t appear to account for.

Performance, complexity and consumer behaviour

Passive House standards require not just technical excellence during construction, but also informed and engaged occupants. MVHR systems need to be used and maintained correctly. 
Most consumers have never heard of Passive House and even fewer understand how to live in one. The risk? Housebuilders meet performance targets on paper, only for real-world outcomes to fall short.

England’s different path

While Scotland may be moving towards Passive House equivalent regulation, England does not have a similar legislative plan. Instead, England will adopt the Future Homes Standard in 2025, targeting:

• 75–80% emissions reductions (vs. 2013 levels).
• Heavy reliance on heat pumps, improved insulation, and greater airtightness.
• However, this would not be based on Passive House methodology or performance guarantees.

If Scotland does proceed with Passive House equivalent standards this could cause a divergence, particularly where some housebuilders operate both north and south of the border.

Scotland’s Passive House landscape

While the UK’s Passive House portfolio has largely consisted of bespoke private homes, Scotland is beginning to scale up. Residential examples have been seen in Inverness-shire, Kirkintilloch and Stirlingshire, as well as examples in social housing and in the education sector.

In addition, Scotland’s ageing tenement stock presents a major retrofit opportunity. The Passivhaus Trust’s EnerPHit standard offers a tailored approach for existing buildings. A recent project in Glasgow saw a pioneering retrofit of a pre-1919 tenement. This achieved a 90% energy reduction using vapour-open insulation, airtight construction, MVHR and triple glazing, at a cost of around £88,000 per flat. 

Key retrofit challenges which emerged were:

• High upfront costs.
• Mixed-tenure ownership.
• Complexities in moisture management and heritage preservation.
  
  

Conclusion – A sector under pressure

The construction sector is already under strain from inflation, material shortages, planning delays and labour challenges. Layering on the cost and complexity of Passive House standards especially within such a tight timeline risks stalling the delivery of new homes just when they’re needed most.

The Scottish Government’s push toward potential Passive House equivalent standards reflect a commendable commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability. However, implementing these standards would present significant challenges as highlighted above, particularly in the context of the housing emergency that has been declared.

Achieving Passive House certification can be complex and costly, especially for affordable housing projects. The stringent requirements and associated expenses may hinder the rapid delivery of much needed homes.

While the benefits of Passive House are clear, alternative approaches such as fabric-first strategies and emerging technologies may offer more flexible, cost-effective routes to energy efficiency at scale. As pressure mounts to build more homes quickly, striking the right balance between environmental ambition and practical delivery will be essential.

Balancing the aspiration for high energy performance with the practicalities of cost and housing demand is crucial. A flexible approach that considers various strategies may better serve Scotland’s immediate housing needs while still advancing environmental objectives. 

There must be a better, more flexible way forward, one that supports a gradual transition to net zero, recognises market realities and does not put new housing supply at risk, in pursuit of performance standards the sector isn’t ready to deliver.  From a housebuilder’s standpoint, the Scottish Government’s proposed approach to Passive House equivalent standards could bring significant risk.

Related News, Insights & Events