The consultation on an opt-out class action procedure for Scotland has arrived.
We have been discussing a potentially seismic change to litigation exposure for businesses operating in Scotland – and today marks a significant step towards this becoming a reality.
The mention of ‘class actions’ tends to conjure images of a US-style system. Scotland’s current group proceedings regime is a more modest version, but a ‘Call for Evidence’ (consultation) published today by the Scottish Civil Justice Council envisages a procedure that would bring us much closer to that model, and could have serious implications for businesses selling to or operating within Scotland – regardless of whether those businesses have any physical Scottish presence.
At the moment, individuals must actively ‘opt in’ to be part of a group claim, and claimant firms require to take time advertising and recruiting claims before proceedings can be raised. Litigation funders underwriting the claim might also consider the number of claimants signed up to an action before assessing whether it is economically viable to proceed. The proposed shift to an ‘opt-out’ regime would flip the process: proceedings could be brought on behalf of large classes of consumers without identifying specific individuals in advance, and claimants would have to opt out if they didn’t want to be involved. That could pave the way for vast claims, with enormous numbers of claimants and, in turn, significant sums being sued for – all of which would make it far easier for these claims to get off the ground in Scotland. This would be a game-changer in terms of litigation risk, making Scotland a more attractive forum for large-scale consumer or other group claims. Given the potential for data breach, product liability, consumer protection or climate related claims, there is significant potential exposure for businesses engaging with consumers, with large numbers of employees or manufacturing products that are ultimately sold into Scotland, regardless of sector.
Of course, there exists the UK-wide Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”), which has its own opt-out process for competition law issues, and a number of consumer claims have been litigated there on the basis they have a nexus with a competition law claim. A Call for Evidence on that procedure recently closed, and there will be elements of those consultation responses that will no doubt inform the Scottish process. It is worth noting that (unlike the CAT procedure) the new Scottish procedure is open to covering all areas of law, and could result in simultaneous or overlapping claims in multiple jurisdictions, increasing strategic and legal complexity for UK-wide and global businesses.
Primary legislation is already in place for this, so the consultation process is taking place through the Scottish Civil Justice Council. The Call for Evidence is open for responses until 26 January 2026. The topics at issue are significant and worthy of response – including: (i) the types of claims to which this should apply; (ii) funding; (iii) process and requirements for settlement; and (iv) costs, in addition to a range of procedural matters, and the introduction of the procedure as a concept entirely.
Our group litigation team are leaders in this field, having been involved in Scotland’s first ever opt-in claim and a number of others since. We would welcome the opportunity to explain this issue more, and hear your thoughts. Do get in touch if you are interested in having your views represented on this major development in litigation risk in Scotland. We will, of course, be publishing further updates on this as matters develop.
Written by
Pauline McCulloch
Director
Dispute Resolution
Related News, Insights & Events
Error.
No results.
Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa: directors’ duties tighten
11/11/2025
s.172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires directors always to act in the way that they consider would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members.
Payment clauses – still a feature of Scottish dilapidations
10/11/2025
Clear and concise wording is vital in lease agreements. Read a recent Court of Session case involving a high-value dilapidations claim for a property in Glasgow.
Who really wants to be a lawyer anyway?
05/11/2025
Using the title “lawyer” will be protected, and providers who are not authorised under the Act may be prevented from describing themselves as lawyers or regulated legal services providers.
{name}
{properties.pageSummary}
{properties.headline}
{properties.pageDate|date:dd/MM/yyyy}
{properties.shortDescription}