1. Applicable law

Much of the underlying substantive law with maritime disputes is the same under Scots law and English law. For example, the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 and regulations passed under it apply in Scotland. International Conventions are signed up to at UK level.

However, the Scottish procedure is very different (more on which below) and other substantive laws which impact on shipping disputes can differ from English law and therefore create different results in respect of a particular dispute.

2. Court system

There is no Admiralty Court in Scotland and there are no specialist Admiralty judges. Disputes are generally heard in the Court of Session in Edinburgh (our High Court) for disputes worth over £100,000 and local Sheriff Courts for claims worth less than that.

3. Actions in rem and in personam

A Scottish admiralty action may be brought in rem (against the vessel) where the subject matter of the dispute or debt relates to the list of claims in section 47(2) of the Administration of Justice Act 1956.  This is nearly identical to the list of claims in section 20(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 which may be heard in the High Court in England.

An action raised against the owner of a ship, the demise charterers, or other parties interested in a ship will be a claim in personam. An action can be raised both in rem and in personam where there are rights of action against the owner and the vessel.

4. Ship arrest

There are several matters which require to be taken into account when contemplating arresting a ship (or if your ship is arrested) in Scotland. See this link for details.

5. Timebars

The default timebar for contractual claims in Scotland is five years (compared to six years under English law). When the clock starts can also differ.

There are shorter timebars for specific maritime incidents such as collisions, as is the case in England.

6. Regulators

The MCA and MAIB (and sometimes HSE) investigate maritime accidents in broadly the same way as in England. However, how they exercise those powers does differ, particularly relating to interviews of witnesses and suspects.

The MCA and HSE cannot prosecute in Scotland. They can only recommend prosecutions to Scotland’s prosecuting authority (COPFS) which will decide whether to prosecute and will conduct the prosecution itself.

Police Scotland will assume initial primacy over investigations when there has been a fatality.  They too have to report their findings and recommendations to COPFS.

7. Fatalities

In the event of a fatality in Scotland or Scottish waters during a commercial maritime incident there requires to be a Fatal Accident Inquiry (FAI). The nearest comparator procedurally would be the Coroner’s Inquest procedure in England. The FAI is brought to court by COPFS and is heard in front of a Sheriff. There can be no civil or criminal sanction at the end of it, but findings in fact are made in relation to how the accident occurred and how it could have been avoided. Recommendations are sometimes made to avoid future similar incidents.

There can be both a prosecution and an FAI in respect of the same incident, with the prosecution typically coming first.

8. Damages regime

Losses can be calculated very differently under Scots law for a wide variety of claims and the heads of claim have very different nomenclature.

The starkest difference is in relation to people claims, particularly where there has been a fatality, with each qualifying member of the family having individual rights / interests. The Damages (Scotland) Act 2011 contains the substantive law.

9. Judicial interest

The default rate of judicial interest in Scotland is 8% per annum. There are some exceptions to this. The rate will typically be applied from when the loss was sustained. Judicial interest on high value claims can therefore be very significant indeed.

10. Vessel registration and mortgages

Scottish ships are registered on the UK Ship Register (UKSR). There is no separate Scottish branch.

The statutory mortgage form comes from the Maritime and Coastguard Agency. It should be executed in compliance with the laws of the vessel’s home port. For a vessel with a home port in Scotland, the requirements for execution of the mortgage will differ compared with English vessels.

For both types, the compensation is in reference to ‘reasonableness’ and is often inherently broad brush or sometimes, for the larger claims, in reference to notional hourly rates.

Written by

Andrew Forsyth 0978 Web Update2025

Andrew Forsyth

Partner

Marine & Shipping

andrew.forsyth@burnesspaull.com +44 (0)131 370 8968

Get in touch
Neil Smith

Neil Smith

Partner

Dispute Resolution

neil.smith@burnesspaull.com +44 (0)1224 618535

Get in touch

Related News, Insights & Events

Risk Resilience

Risk resilience: Navigating the storm

29/10/2025


Technology, regulatory changes, changing market forces, and macroeconomic factors all present key concerns for business.

Read more
Energy Risk Conf

Navigating legal and compliance challenges in the energy sector: from environmental risks to workforce management

01/10/2025 - Aberdeen


Navigating legal and compliance challenges in the energy sector conference - we will cover environmental risks to workforce management

Read more
Data And The Digital Economy Conf

Data and the digital economy: Managing risk and making the most of opportunities

30/09/2025 - Edinburgh


Data is everywhere – and the ways in which we’re collecting, processing and utilising it are constantly evolving, while regulation and governance best practice struggles to keep up.

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here Subscribe here